Humoral Response to SARS-COV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to increase in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Vaccination is recommended in this patient population, and the effect of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) on response to vaccination should be considered. METHODS: This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study investigated humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination as well as possible predictors for response in patients with MS and other neuroinflammatory diseases who received DMTs in routine clinical practice in Spain. Responses were compared versus those seen in healthy controls. RESULTS: After vaccination against COVID-19, most patients with MS developed an immune response comparable to that of healthy individuals. However, approximately half of patients receiving a sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator (SP1-M, fingolimod or siponimod) or a B-cell-depleting agent (aCD20, ocrelizumab or rituximab) did not develop protective antibodies, although patients receiving other DMTs had humoral immune responses comparable to healthy controls. Lymphocyte count was not associated with reduced humoral response in patients receiving an SP1-M or aCD20, whereas, in patients receiving an aCD20 or SP1-M, older age was associated with lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunoglobulin G antibody levels. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with aCD20 or SP1-M therapies appears to be associated with a lower humoral response to vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccination prior to initiation of these DMTs should be recommended whenever possible.

Corrigendum: Intrafamilial variability in SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1219262.].

Intrafamilial variability in SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders.

Introduction: Phenotypic spectrum of SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders (SLC6A1-NDD) includes intellectual disability (ID), autistic spectrum disorders (ASD), epilepsy, developmental delay, beginning from early infancy or after seizure onset, and other neurological features such as hypotonia and movement disorders. Data on familial phenotypic heterogeneity have been rarely reported, thus in our study we aimed to investigate intrafamilial phenotypic variability in families with SLC6A1 variants. Methods: We collected clinical, laboratory and genetic data on 39 individuals, including 17 probands, belonging to 13 families harboring inherited variants of SLC6A1. Data were collected through an international network of Epilepsy and Genetic Centers. Results: Main clinical findings in the whole cohort of 39 subjects were: (a) epilepsy, mainly presenting with generalized seizures, reported in 71% of probands and 36% of siblings or first/second-degree relatives. Within a family, the same epilepsy type (generalized or focal) was observed; (b) ID reported in 100% and in 13% of probands and siblings or first/second-degree relatives, respectively; (c) learning disabilities detected in 28% of the SLC6A1 carriers, all of them were relatives of a proband; (d) around 51% of the whole cohort presented with psychiatric symptoms or behavioral disorders, including 82% of the probands. Out of the 19 patients with psychiatric symptoms, ASD were diagnosed in 40% of them; (e) neurological findings (primarily tremor and speech difficulties) were observed 38.5% of the whole cohort, including 10 probands. Our families harbored 12 different SLC6A1 variants, one was a frameshift, two stop-gain, while the remaining were missense. No genotype-phenotype associations were identified. Discussion: Our study showed that first-or second-degree relatives presented with a less severe phenotype, featuring mainly mild intellectual and/or learning disabilities, at variance with the probands who suffered from moderate to severe ID, generalized, sometimes intractable, epileptic seizures, behavioral and psychiatric disorders. These findings may suggest that a proportion of individuals with mild SLC6A1-NDD might be missed, in particular those with an older age where genetic testing is not performed. Further studies on intrafamilial phenotypic variability are needed to confirm our results and possibly to expand the phenotypic spectrum of these disorders and benefit genetic counseling.

Treatment with natalizumab during pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: The experience of implementing a clinical practice protocol (NAP-30).

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy planning in women with highly active multiple sclerosis (HAMS) who need a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (heDMT) currently requires a careful risk-benefit evaluation. This includes minimizing fetal drug toxicity and preventing MS reactivation. We describe our experience with natalizumab in women with HAMS and unplanned pregnancy by implementing a clinical practice protocol (NAP-30) designed to maintain the effectiveness of natalizumab during pregnancy, reduce fetal exposure and prevent complications. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective study including women with HAMS on active treatment with natalizumab who became unexpectedly pregnant in the period 2018-2021 and continued this treatment during pregnancy according to the NAP-30 protocol. MS clinical and radiological variables were analyzed before and during pregnancy and in the postpartum period, along with maternal and fetal toxicity during pregnancy and safety findings in newborns. We also describe the NAP-30 protocol, which includes the use of a bridging dose to adjust and maintain natalizumab infusions every 6 weeks during pregnancy up to week 30 and scheduled delivery at week 40. RESULTS: Six women (one in her first gestation) with a median age of 31.5 years at the onset of pregnancy (min-max: 24-37 years) were included. All were negative for anti-John Cunningham virus (JCV) antibodies and were on treatment with intravenous natalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks. At the time of conception, three patients had received 12, 17 and 53 infusions of natalizumab, respectively, while for the remaining three patients natalizumab was their first DMT (two patients had received 6 infusions and one patient had received 3 infusions of natalizumab). All six patients received 6 doses of natalizumab during pregnancy according to the NAP-30 protocol. After delivery, all six patients restarted natalizumab every 4 weeks (median: 3 days; range: 2-4 days). No patients had relapses during pregnancy or at 6 months postpartum, nor did they develop any general health or laboratory abnormalities. The MRI scan performed at 4-6 months postpartum showed no new T2 lesions or gadolinium-enhancing lesions. No miscarriages or threatened miscarriages were reported. One of the patients underwent elective preterm delivery at week 35 after mild-to-moderate anemia was detected by fetal Doppler scan. The newborn had low birth weight (2080 g) and mild anemia, which resolved within two months with oral iron supplementation. The other infants were born with normal birth weight and showed no blood count abnormalities. After a median follow-up of 10 months, all six babies showed normal development with no complications detected. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, the implementation of the NAP-30 protocol in women with HAMS and unplanned pregnancy undergoing treatment with natalizumab allows the continuation of natalizumab during pregnancy, with a very favorable clinical and radiological effectiveness and maternal-fetal safety profile during pregnancy and postpartum. Both in pregnancy with HAMS and in general, and particularly for successful implementation of the NAP-30 protocol, obstetric support and monitoring is essential for adequate pregnancy management.

Baseline Inflammatory Status Reveals Dichotomic Immune Mechanisms Involved In Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Pathology.

Objective: To ascertain the role of inflammation in the response to ocrelizumab in primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Methods: Multicenter prospective study including 69 patients with PPMS who initiated ocrelizumab treatment, classified according to baseline presence [Gd+, n=16] or absence [Gd-, n=53] of gadolinium-enhancing lesions in brain MRI. Ten Gd+ (62.5%) and 41 Gd- patients (77.4%) showed non-evidence of disease activity (NEDA) defined as no disability progression or new MRI lesions after 1 year of treatment. Blood immune cell subsets were characterized by flow cytometry, serum immunoglobulins by nephelometry, and serum neurofilament light-chains (sNfL) by SIMOA. Statistical analyses were corrected with the Bonferroni formula. Results: More than 60% of patients reached NEDA after a year of treatment, regardless of their baseline characteristics. In Gd+ patients, it associated with a low repopulation rate of inflammatory B cells accompanied by a reduction of sNfL values 6 months after their first ocrelizumab dose. Patients in Gd- group also had low B cell numbers and sNfL values 6 months after initiating treatment, independent of their treatment response. In these patients, NEDA status was associated with a tolerogenic remodeling of the T and innate immune cell compartments, and with a clear increase of serum IgA levels. Conclusion: Baseline inflammation influences which immunological pathways predominate in patients with PPMS. Inflammatory B cells played a pivotal role in the Gd+ group and inflammatory T and innate immune cells in Gd- patients. B cell depletion can modulate both mechanisms.

Prevention of rebound effect after natalizumab withdrawal in multiple sclerosis. Study of two high-dose methylprednisolone schedules.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NTZ) is a disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) whose discontinuation can produce a "rebound effect", consisting of severe clinical deterioration and/or evidence of disease reactivation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of two treatment schedules with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) administered during the washout period of natalizumab (i.e., before starting another DMT) in preventing the rebound phenomenon. METHODS: Five-year retrospective study of NTZ withdrawals after at least 24 uninterrupted doses. Two IVMP schedules were tested. In schedule 1 (3-month washout), 1, 2, and 3 g of IVMP were administered on the first, second, and third month respectively. In schedule 2 (2-month washout), 1 and 2 g of IVMP were administered on the first and second month respectively. A new DMT was started 10 days after the end of each schedule. Rebound was defined as at least one clinical relapse plus rebound activity on MRI (>5 gadolinium-enhanced lesions and a number of new/T2-enhanced and/or gadolinium-enhanced lesions greater than before initiation of NTZ) during washout or at 6 months after new DMT initiation (6M-DMT). Clinical and MRI evaluations were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation of the new DMT. RESULTS: Fifty patients (68% women) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 37.76 (10.88) years and pre-NTZ annualized relapse rate (ARR) of 1.78 (1.04). During NTZ therapy, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 3.7 (1.73) and ARR was 0.23 (0.39). The ARR (mean of both schedules) was 0.1 (0.71) during washout and 0.32 (0.84) at 6M-DMT. Rebound was observed in 10% of cases (n = 5), with no significant clinical or radiological differences (p>0.05) between the two IVMP schedules. Rebound was observed in younger patients and was associated with new MRI lesions and higher ARR at 3M-DMT and 6M-DMT respectively, with no difference in EDSS after 2 years of follow-up. Neither the ARR before NTZ initiation nor the choice of new DMT after NTZ discontinuation was associated with development of rebound effect. CONCLUSIONS: Both IVMP schedules were well tolerated during NTZ washout and rebound was observed in only 10% of cases. In our experience, administration of IVMP during NTZ washout could reduce the possibility of a rebound effect.

Difusión de los antibióticos en el sistema nervioso central / Antibiotic diffusion to central nervous system

Las infecciones del sistema nervioso central (SNC) causadas por patógenos mutiresistentes suponen un reto terapéutico. El paso de fluidos y de solutos al SNC está estrechamente regulado a través de la barrera hematoencefálica (BHE).La penetración de cualquier fármaco, inclusive los antibióticos, en el líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) depende del tamaño molecular, la lipofilicidad, la unión a proteínas plasmáticas y su afinidadpor transportadores de la BHE. La relación entre el área bajo la curva en el LCR y el suero AUCCSF (Area Bajo la Curva en LCR) / AUCS (Area Bajo la Curva en suero) de una sustancia es el parámetro más preciso para determinar su capacidad de difusión. Linezolid, algunas quinolonas y metronidazol consiguen altas concentraciones en LCR y son útiles para tratar microorganismos sensibles. Algunos antibióticos cuya permeabilidad a través de la BHE es baja pueden ser administrados directamente en el ventrículo a la vez que se realiza infusión intravenosa. El antibiótico ideal para tratar una infección del SNC es pequeño, no tiene alta tasa de unión a proteínas plasmáticas, es moderadamente lipofílico y no es un ligando de alta afinidad a bombas de expulsión de la BHE. Conocer la farmacocinética de los antibióticos y su interacción con la BHE permitirá mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes con infecciones del SNC. En este artículo se exponen las propiedades físico-químicas de los principales grupos de antibióticos para evaluar cuáles son más prometedores en el tratamiento de las infecciones del SNC y cómo usarlos en la práctica clínica habitual (AU)

Central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by pathogens with a reduced sensitivity to drugs are a therapeutic challenge. Transport of fluid and solutes is tightly controlled within CNS, where vasculature exhibits a blood-brain barrier (BBB).The entry of drugs, including antibiotics, into the cerebro- spinal fluid (CSF) is governed by molecular size, lipophilicity, plasma protein binding and their affinity to transport systems at the BBB. The ratio of the AUCCSF (Area under the curve in CSF)/AUCS (Area under the curve in serum) is the most accurate parameter to characterize drug penetration into the CSF. Linezolid, some fluoroquinolones and metronidazole get high CSF concentrations and are useful for treating susceptible pathogens. Some highly active antibiotic compounds with low BBB permeability can be directly administered into the ventricles together with concomitant intravenous therapy. The ideal antibiotic to treat CNS infections should be that with a small moderately lipophilic molecule, low plasma protein binding and low affinity to efflux pumps at BBB. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics at the BBB will assist to optimize antibiotic treatment in CNS infections. This article reviews the physicochemical properties of the main groups of antibiotics to assess which compounds are most promising for the treatment of CNS infections and how to use them in the daily clinical practice (AU)

Encefalitis progresiva por anticuerpos anti-DPPX: un caso con buena respuesta al tratamiento con rituximab / Progressive encephalitis due to anti-DPPX antibodies: a case with good response to treatment with rituximab

No disponible